Aims: Acute stent recoil and luminal filling defects can result in a suboptimal angiographic result following stent deployment and are associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the effect of double stenting, deployment of a second stent within the first, in the treatment of these conditions and to review the literature on this procedure.
Methods and results: Thirteen cases of double stenting performed by a single operator at the Manchester Royal Infirmary over a three year period were identified and quantitative coronary angiography was performed. The indication for double stenting was acute stent recoil in eight cases, luminal filling defects in three cases and a combination of recoil and filling defects in two cases. There was a high frequency of target vessel calcification (77%) and ostial lesions (23%). Following double stenting, mean minimum lumen diameter increased significantly from 2.5 mm to 3.5 mm (p <0.001). There were no procedural complications. At mean clinical follow-up of 19 months (range six to 37 months), there were no major adverse cardiac events.
Conclusions: Double stenting can significantly improve angiographic outcome in cases of acute stent recoil and luminal filling defects, with excellent clinical results in the medium term.