Learning from diagnostic errors: a good way to improve education in radiology

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jun;78(3):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.028. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the causes and the main categories of diagnostic errors in radiology as a method for improving education in radiology.

Material and methods: A Medline search was performed using PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) for original research publications discussing errors in diagnosis with specific reference to radiology. The search strategy employed different combinations of the following terms: (1) diagnostic radiology, (2) radiological error and (3) medical negligence. This review was limited to human studies and to English-language literature. Two authors reviewed all the titles and subsequently the abstracts of 491 articles that appeared pertinent. Additional articles were identified by reviewing the reference lists of relevant papers. Finally, the full text of 75 selected articles was reviewed.

Results: Several studies show that the etiology of radiological error is multi-factorial. The main category of claims against radiologists includes the misdiagnoses. Radiologic "misses" typically are one of two types: either missed fractures or missed diagnosis of cancer. The most commonly missed fractures include those in the femur, the navicular bone, and the cervical spine. The second type of "miss" is failure to diagnose cancer. Lack of appreciation of lung nodules on chest radiographs and breast lesions on mammograms are the predominant problems.

Conclusion: Diagnostic errors should be considered not as signs of failure, but as learning opportunities.

MeSH terms

  • Diagnostic Errors / prevention & control*
  • Diagnostic Errors / statistics & numerical data*
  • Diagnostic Imaging / statistics & numerical data*
  • MEDLINE / statistics & numerical data*
  • Quality Improvement / statistics & numerical data*
  • Radiology / education*
  • Radiology / statistics & numerical data*