[Stroboscopy findings: a comparison of flexible CCD-videostroboscopy and rigid stroboscopy]

Laryngorhinootologie. 2011 Apr;90(4):218-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271631. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Objective: After exclusion of morphologic laryngeal alterations by laryngoscopy the prospective study compared stroboscopy findings using a flexible distal charge-coupled device chip-optic (CCD-optic) and a rigid 70° - or 90° -laryngoscope.

Material and methods: 52 patients with functional dysphonia and 47 candidates for speech therapy education were checked with both examination methods. The stroboscopy results were rated randomized and pseudonymized by 3 experts assessed by a study protocol according to the European laryngological society basic protocol 2001.

Results: The interrater-reliability was moderate to good. Using the flexible videolaryngoscopy less gaging, less supraglottic contraction during phonation, more often a complete glottal closure and more often a normal mucosal wave movement were found.

Conclusion: To get an optimal endoscopy result the combination of rigid laryngoscopy and flexible videolaryngoscopy and -stroboscopy will be recommended. Because of the variety of stroboscopic findings for the diagnosis of functional dysphonia additional the case history and functional voice examinations are necessary.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Dysphonia / diagnosis*
  • Dysphonia / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laryngoscopy / instrumentation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation*
  • Speech Therapy*
  • Stroboscopy / instrumentation*
  • Video Recording / instrumentation*
  • Voice Quality