"Proteomineering" serum biomarkers. A study in scarlet

Electrophoresis. 2011 Apr;32(9):976-80. doi: 10.1002/elps.201000695. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

Abstract

The performance of sera pre-treatment for biomarker searching via combinatorial peptide ligand libraries (CPLL) has recently been challenged (Proteomics 2010, 10, 1416-1425) and stated to allow discovery of only medium to high-abundance proteins. We have thus investigated four elution protocols, as published in recent reports: (i) in 4 M urea+1% CHAPS; (ii) in 4 M urea+1% CHAPS+5% acetic acid; (iii) in 8 M urea+2% CHAPS+5% acetic acid; (iv) in boiling 4% SDS+25 mM DTT. One milliliter of serum, in all cases, was captured with 50 μL of CPLL beads, which were then eluted with the four eluants described above. In the first three cases, after the first elution, the beads were re-eluted with cocktail (iv), known to offer maximal release of proteins adsorbed by the CPLL ligands. Eluant (i) released only ca. 20% of the species adsorbed, eluant (ii) ca. 60%, eluant (iii) ca. 80%. Thus, the poor performance of the CPLL methodology, as reported in (i) is not due to any fault of the capture technique, but simply to the adoption of a very poor elution protocol. Even those using eluants (ii) and (iii) should know that a substantial fraction of the captured species still remains bound to the beads and is thus not available to biomarker discovery. Once more, eluant (iv) is recognized as the only one able to offer optimal recovery from the CPLL baits.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers / blood*
  • Chemical Fractionation
  • Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques / methods*
  • Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional
  • Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel
  • Peptide Library*
  • Proteomics / methods*
  • Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Peptide Library