The Hill antireflux repair at 5 institutions over 25 years

Am J Surg. 2011 May;201(5):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.002.

Abstract

Background: Long-term (> 5 years) studies of antireflux operations are needed. This study evaluates long-term results of the open Hill repair at multiple institutions.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of open Hill repairs from 1972 to 1997 at 5 North American medical centers with a mean follow-up of 10 years. Objective data and standardized clinical outcomes were collected at a central site. Subjective results, medication use, and satisfaction scales were obtained through scripted phone interview. Results between 2 Hill-trained centers and 3 independent centers were compared.

Results: One thousand one hundred eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Symptomatic improvement was found in 97% and good to excellent results in 93%. Medication use was markedly reduced. Hiatal hernia recurrence was found in 77 (6.9%); the reoperation rate was 1.9%. Differences in outcomes between Hill centers and independent centers were minor.

Conclusions: Excellent results with the open Hill repair are durable beyond 10 years and are reproducible. Anatomic recurrence and reoperative rates are low.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Esophagus / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Fundoplication / methods*
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suture Techniques
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome