Development, validation and data quality assurance of screening methods: a case study

Anal Chim Acta. 2011 Aug 26;700(1-2):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 May 14.

Abstract

Despite the growing importance of qualitative screening tests in routine laboratories involved in the EU official control, their validation is not as deeply explained in Commission Decision 2002/657/EC as the validation of quantitative confirmatory methods. At the same time, the issue of quality assurance of screening assays defining internal quality control (IQC) procedures as required by accreditation bodies is undoubtedly less developed in this analytical field. As an example the present study describes the development, the validation and the IQC implemented for a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) able to detect 17-α-19-nortestosterone (α-NT) and 17-β-19-nortestosterone (β-NT) isomers in bullock urine. In order to select a suitable sample treatment, two SPE purification protocols were preliminary compared. The chosen method was therefore fully validated determining the mandatory parameters required by Commission Decision 2002/657/EC: specificity, detection capability and robustness. An in-depth discussion was carried out illustrating the possible validation approaches and their implications especially in the assessment of the key performance characteristic: detection capability. Finally, the control charts implemented for continuous method verification during analyses of real samples were reported.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / standards
  • Isomerism
  • Male
  • Nandrolone / isolation & purification
  • Nandrolone / standards
  • Nandrolone / urine*
  • Quality Control
  • Solid Phase Extraction / methods

Substances

  • Nandrolone