Effects of levosimendan on mortality and hospitalization. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):634-46. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232962a.

Abstract

Objective: Catecholaminergic inotropes have a place in the management of low output syndrome and decompensated heart failure but their effect on mortality is debated. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer that enhances myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen use. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the impact of levosimendan on mortality and hospital stay.

Data sources: BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials were searched for pertinent studies. International experts and the manufacturer were contacted.

Study selection: Articles were assessed by four trained investigators, with divergences resolved by consensus. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison of levosimendan vs. control. There were no restrictions on dose or time of levosimendan administration or on language. Exclusion criteria were: duplicate publications, nonadult studies, oral administration of levosimendan, and no data on main outcomes.

Data extraction: Study end points, main outcomes, study design, population, clinical setting, levosimendan dosage, and treatment duration were extracted.

Data synthesis: Data from 5,480 patients in 45 randomized clinical trials were analyzed. The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (507 of 2,915) among levosimendan-treated patients and 23.3% (598 of 2,565) in the control group (risk ratio 0.80 [0.72; 0.89], p for effect <.001, number needed to treat = 17 with 45 studies included). Reduction in mortality was confirmed in studies with placebo (risk ratio 0.82 [0.69; 0.97], p = .02) or dobutamine (risk ratio 0.68 [0.52-0.88]; p = .003) as comparator and in studies performed in cardiac surgery (risk ratio 0.52 [0.35; 0.76] p = .001) or cardiology (risk ratio 0.75 [0.63; 0.91], p = .003) settings. Length of hospital stay was reduced in the levosimendan group (weighted mean difference = -1.31 [-1.95; -0.31], p for effect = .007, with 17 studies included). A trend toward a higher percentage of patients experiencing hypotension was noted in levosimendan vs. control (risk ratio 1.39 [0.97-1.94], p = .053).

Conclusions: Levosimendan might reduce mortality in cardiac surgery and cardiology settings of adult patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / mortality
  • Critical Care / methods
  • Critical Illness / mortality
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy
  • Heart Failure / mortality
  • Hospital Mortality / trends*
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Hydrazones / therapeutic use*
  • Prognosis
  • Pyridazines / therapeutic use*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Risk Assessment
  • Simendan
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hydrazones
  • Pyridazines
  • Simendan