[Variant angina: what to think in 2011?]

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2011 Dec;60(6):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Spastic angina is considered rare but its prevalence is probably underestimated especially in case of atherosclerotic coronary lesions. Its diagnosis remains important due to its poor prognosis and therapeutic characteristics. We report three clinical cases illustrating two different clinical presentations and the problem of diagnosis of spastic angina. We performed a review of the literature essentially concerning commonly used diagnosis means and especially provocative testing for coronary spasm. This test needs to be adapted to the evolution of techniques and uses of coronary angiography in 2011, particularly the wide spread use of radial approach. Therefore new recommendations are needed, specifying the terms of provocative testing and establishing clear diagnosis criteria including clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic data. Such guidelines would probably help to better diagnose and treat these patients in our practice.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Angina Pectoris, Variant / diagnosis*
  • Angina Pectoris, Variant / diagnostic imaging
  • Angina Pectoris, Variant / drug therapy*
  • Angina Pectoris, Variant / etiology
  • Coronary Angiography / methods
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Dyslipidemias / complications
  • Echocardiography
  • Electrocardiography
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / complications
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Radial Artery
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vasodilator Agents / therapeutic use
  • Verapamil / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Verapamil