False-negative fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules cannot be attributed to sampling error alone

Am J Surg. 2012 Mar;203(3):331-4; discussion 334. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.016. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study was to determine whether sampling error was the major cause for false-negative fine needle aspiration (FNA) results for thyroid nodules.

Methods: Patients who underwent preoperative FNA between 1994 and 2008 were identified, and the results were compared with surgical pathology findings. Other related variables including nodule number and size were also recorded.

Results: Excluding the microcarcinomas, the false-negative rate was 4% (19/479). Sampling errors occurred in only 4 (21%) cases in which the malignant nodule was not actually biopsied. Of the other 15 cases, 8 (53%) were solitary nodules, 8 (53%) were ≥4 cm in size, and 5 (33%) had underlying thyroiditis. Because of the missed diagnosis, 9 patients (47%) had lobectomy only as the initial surgery, which then required a completion thyroidectomy.

Conclusions: Sampling error is a minor cause for false-negative FNAs, suggesting that there are some inherent limitations to cytological evaluation of the thyroid.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy, Fine-Needle*
  • Child
  • Diagnostic Errors / statistics & numerical data*
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thyroid Nodule / pathology*
  • Thyroid Nodule / surgery
  • Thyroidectomy
  • Young Adult