Objective: Japanese physicians' attitudes regarding the health-care needs of young adult childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) are not well described. Thus, we examined the self-reported preferences and knowledge of pediatric oncologists and surgeons.
Methods: A mailed survey was sent to 858 physician members of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Oncology. We compared the responses of pediatric oncologists and pediatric surgeons.
Results: The pediatric oncologists' response rate was 56% (300 out of 533) and that of pediatric surgeons 32% (105 out of 325). The median age of respondents was 46 and 48 years, respectively; 79 and 84% were men. When comfort levels in caring for CCSs were described (i.e. 1 = very uncomfortable; 7 = very comfortable), the mean levels were 4.4 and 3.8 with CCSs ≤ 21 years, 3.6 and 3.6 with 21 years < CCSs ≤ 30 years, and 2.8 and 3.3 with CCSs > 30 years, respectively. In clinical vignette questions, 62% of the pediatric oncologists and 43% of the surgeons answered three or more questions appropriately. Pediatric surgeons reported significantly lower familiarity with long-term follow-up guidelines than pediatric oncologists. Most pediatric oncologists and many surgeons conducted truth-telling of cancer diagnosis to adult CCSs now. They thought that the most important issues are an original long-term follow-up guideline suitable for the Japanese situation and collaborations with adult-based general physicians.
Conclusions: Many Japanese pediatric oncologists are uncomfortable with caring for survivors as they age and have suboptimal knowledge regarding late effects. The change in truth-telling situation and preference for collaboration with adult-based physicians was demonstrated also in Japan.