Background: Digital dermoscopy has been shown to permit an earlier detection of melanoma. However, few studies have investigated its added value in reducing unnecessary excisions in everyday clinical practice.
Objectives: To compare, in daily practice, the efficiency of three dermoscopy methods: dermoscopy alone with little training, dermoscopy alone with adequate training and dermoscopy with adequate training and access to digital dermoscopy, and to confirm the safety of this latter approach.
Methods: Thirty-six dermatologists working without digital dermoscopy were divided into two groups according to their training in dermoscopy. The third group constituted of two dermatologists working in a pigmented lesion clinic with access to the digital dermoscopy technique and eight additional dermatologists working in the same dermatology department. These 46 dermatologists included all presumed melanocytic lesions excised over a period of 1 year. The primary endpoint was the melanoma/nonmelanoma ratio (M/NM-R); secondary endpoints were the ratio of 'problem' naevi to common naevi (PN/CN-R), specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma, in situ/invasive melanoma ratio, and the mean Breslow thickness.
Results: In total, 1865 excised lesions, including 231 melanomas, were included. In the digital dermoscopy availability group (DD-G) the M/NM-R was significantly better (1/2.43), as was the PN/CN-R (1/1.48) (P < 0.001 in both cases). The specificity was significantly higher in the DD-G and significantly higher for trained examiners as compared with examiners with little training. More that one-third of all melanomas discovered by digital dermoscopy were in situ, and the mean Breslow thickness was 0.32 mm for the invasive ones.
Conclusions: The reduction of unnecessary excisions when using digital dermoscopy compared with dermoscopy alone in our study suggests that access to digital dermoscopy offers a better management of pigmented lesions in daily practice. The high number of early lesions diagnosed by this technique confirms that its use is safe.
© 2012 The Authors. BJD © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.