Comparative effectiveness research: does one size fit all?

Stat Med. 2012 Nov 10;31(25):3062-5; discussion 3066-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.5482. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

Abstract

In this commentary, we argue that although randomization has many benefits, not all questions we seek to answer fit into a randomized setting. Our argument utilizes the clinical setting of carotid atherosclerosis management where specific clinical questions are answered by using a variety of comparative effectiveness designs. Observational studies should not be ruled out when designing studies to address questions of comparative effectiveness.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research / organization & administration*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*