[Diagnostic of pharmacodependence: comparison between patients and doctors approaches. Introduction]

Therapie. 2012 Mar-Apr;67(2):167-72. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2012016. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The aim of our study is to evaluate the extent of agreement between pharmacodependence to benzodiazepines, as diagnosed by doctors and as self evaluated by patients, using DSM-IV dependence criteria. Method. This is a prospective study.

Inclusion criteria: prescription of a benzodiazepines or related substances.

Data collection: doctor questionnaire and patient questionnaire filled anonymously and independently. Main judgment criterion: rate of agreement between doctor diagnosis (is this patient dependent?), and patient evaluation (dependence is positive if at least 3 of the DSM-IV items are met). Results. One hundred and twenty-eight patients were included by 11 doctors: 89 (69.5%) cases of agreement between doctor diagnosis and patient self evaluation and 39 (30.5%) cases of disagreement Discussion. There is an over assessment of dependence: doctors diagnose a dependence in 72% of the disagreement cases although there is none according to the self evaluation; the over assessment shows how difficult it is to evaluate dependence in general practice medicine.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Benzodiazepines*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Substance-Related Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Substance-Related Disorders / epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Benzodiazepines