Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments

Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the readability of online patient education materials among academic otolaryngology departments in the mid-Atlantic region, with the purpose of determining whether these commonly used online resources were written at a level readily understood by the average American.

Methods: A readability analysis of online patient education materials was performed using several commonly used readability assessments including the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, the New Dale-Chall Test, the Coleman-Liau Index, the New Fog Count, the Raygor Readability Estimate, the FORCAST test, and the Fry Graph.

Results: Most patient education materials from these programs were written at or above an 11th grade reading level, considerably above National Institutes of Health guidelines for recommended difficulty.

Conclusions: Patient educational materials from academic otolaryngology Web sites are written at too difficult a reading level for a significant portion of patients and can be simplified.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / methods*
  • Comprehension
  • Humans
  • Internet*
  • Mid-Atlantic Region
  • Otolaryngology / methods*
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures*
  • Patient Education as Topic / methods*
  • Teaching Materials*