Comparison of clinical and surgical-pathologic staging in patients with endometrial carcinoma

J Surg Oncol. 1990 Jan;43(1):33-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930430109.

Abstract

In that accurate staging is essential to proper management of patients with endometrium cancer, preoperative clinical staging was compared with surgical-pathological staging in 160 patients with endometrium cancer. One hundred fifty-two patients had clinical stage I, and eight had clinical stage II disease. Overall, the clinical stage was changed in 26.9% of patients. The incidence of inaccurate staging was 25% for clinical stage I and 62.5% for clinical stage II disease. Endocervical curettage was found to have a 12.5% false-positive rate and an 8.6% false-negative rate. The extent of malignant disease for endometrium cancer (clinical stages I-II) cannot be adequately and accurately assessed with clinical staging because there is a high rate of discordance between clinical and surgical-pathologic staging.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Staging / methods*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Uterine Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Uterine Neoplasms / surgery