Percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial artery: comparison of procedural success in emergency versus non-emergency cases

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;13(5):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.004.

Abstract

Background: STEMI and unstable acute coronary syndromes are associated with widespread adrenergic activation which may increase radial artery (RA) spasm, requiring cross-over to the femoral artery (FA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed the incidence of failed trans-radial artery PCI in emergency cases compared with non-emergency cases.

Methods: PCI procedures performed by default radial artery operators were assessed in our centre over a 25 month period. Those who had both RA and FA access were identified to assess if the double punctures were elective or due to failure of the RA approach. Cross-over rates were compared between emergency and non-emergency cases.

Results: 680 cases of PCI were performed, 153 in an emergency setting. In non-emergency cases 403/527 (76.5%) were performed via the RA. In the emergency setting 139/153 (90.8%) were completed by the RA. Previous CABG with multiple arterial conduits was the most common reason for elective FA PCI in both groups. The RA to FA cross-over rate was low with no significant difference between the emergency and non-emergency groups (emergency 1.4%, non-emergency 1.2%, p=1.0). In both groups there was no significant difference between RA and FA procedures in terms of fluoroscopy times (emergency: mean 13.1 ± 7.9 min vs 16.1 ± 16.1 min, p=.25, non-emergency: 16.6 ± 10.3 min vs 18.7 ± 13.6 min, p=.07) or contrast volumes (emergency: mean 231 ± 126 ml vs 229 ± 102 ml, p=.77, non-emergency: 223 ± 85 ml vs 237 ± 91 ml, p=.15).

Conclusions: The vast majority of PCI can be successfully performed via the RA. Cross-over rates to the FA are low and are not more common in emergency patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / therapy*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • New South Wales
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods*
  • Punctures
  • Radial Artery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Failure