Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Jan;15(1):323. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0323-5.

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder of multiple etiologies that causes long-term damage of various organs including the cardiovascular system. A consistent observation shows that DM amplifies the risk of cardiovascular events by 4- to 6-fold. Since coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients exhibits diffuse and accelerated lesions, invasive revascularization continues to be a challenge and has worse outcomes than patients without DM. Owing to the pathogenesis of DM and the presence of severe endothelial dysfunction, investigators have been trying to find new treatment modalities that could target the treatment of the disease rather than the treatment of the lesion. Until new treatment modalities are proven and gain acceptance, invasive revascularization remains to be the choice of treatment in such patients. The focus of this review is to compare the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of stable CAD in patients with DM.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / economics
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / economics
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / economics
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome