Comparison of two biochemical methods for identifying Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolated from sheep and goats

Vet J. 2013 Jun;196(3):552-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Abstract

The biochemical pattern of Cowan and Steel (BPCS) was compared with a commercial biochemical strip for the identification of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolated from small ruminants. On 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 40/78 coryneform isolates from the lymph nodes of sheep and goats with lesions resembling caseous lymphadenitis were identified as C. pseudotuberculosis. The sensitivities of the BPCS and the commercial biochemical strip relative to 16S rRNA sequencing were 80% and 85%, and their specificities were 92.1% and 94.7%, respectively; the level of agreement between the BPCS and the commercial biochemical strip was high (κ=0.82). Likelihood ratios for positive and negative results were 10.0 and 0.22 for the BPCS, and 16.0 and 0.16 for the commercial biochemical strip, respectively. These results indicate that the BPCS and the commercial biochemical strip are both useful for identifying C. pseudotuberculosis in veterinary microbiology laboratories.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Corynebacterium Infections / diagnosis
  • Corynebacterium Infections / microbiology
  • Corynebacterium Infections / veterinary*
  • Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis / isolation & purification*
  • Goat Diseases / diagnosis
  • Goat Diseases / microbiology*
  • Goats
  • RNA, Bacterial / classification
  • RNA, Bacterial / genetics
  • RNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
  • Reagent Strips
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Sheep
  • Sheep Diseases / diagnosis
  • Sheep Diseases / microbiology*

Substances

  • RNA, Bacterial
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
  • Reagent Strips