Sensitivity to white matter FMRI activation increases with field strength

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058130. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation in white matter is controversial. Given that many of the studies that report fMRI activation in white matter used high field MRI systems, we investigated the field strength dependence of sensitivity to white matter fMRI activation. In addition, we evaluated the temporal signal to noise ratio (tSNR) of the different tissue types as a function of field strength. Data were acquired during a motor task (finger tapping) at 1.5 T and 4 T. Group and individual level activation results were considered in both the sensorimotor cortex and the posterior limb of the internal capsule. We found that sensitivity increases associated with field strength were greater for white matter than gray matter. The analysis of tSNR suggested that white matter might be less susceptible to increases in physiological noise related to increased field strength. We therefore conclude that high field MRI may be particularly advantageous for fMRI studies aimed at investigating activation in both gray and white matter.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping
  • Female
  • Fingers / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Magnetic Fields
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Motor Activity / physiology*
  • Motor Cortex / physiology*
  • Nerve Fibers, Myelinated / physiology*
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Research Council of Canada Genomics and Health Initiative (http://archive.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/ghi.html), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca), the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation (http://www.dmrf.ca/), the Dalhousie Radiology Research Foundation (http://radiologyfoundation.medicine.dal.ca/), and Canada Research Chairs (http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.