Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies

Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jun;33(6):563-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4111.

Abstract

The goal to noninvasively detect fetal aneuploidies using circulating cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma seems to be achieved by the use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). To date, different MPS approaches exist, all aiming to deliver reliable results in a cost effective manner. The most widely used approach is the whole genome MPS method, in which sequencing is performed on maternal plasma to determine the presence of a fetal trisomy. To reduce costs targeted approaches, only analyzing loci from the chromosome(s) of interest has been developed. This review summarizes the different MPS approaches, their benefits and limitations and discusses the implications for future noninvasive prenatal testing.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aneuploidy*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Down Syndrome / diagnosis
  • Down Syndrome / genetics
  • Female
  • Fetus / metabolism
  • Genome, Human
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / economics
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods*
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / economics
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / methods*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA / economics
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA / methods*