Muscle 'regenerative potential' determinesphysical recovery following total knee replacement

Bone Joint Res. 2013 Apr 10;2(4):70-8. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.24.2000151. Print 2013.

Abstract

Objectives: Lower limb muscle power is thought to influence outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). Post-operative deficits in muscle strength are commonly reported, although not explained. We hypothesised that post-operative recovery of lower limb muscle power would be influenced by the number of satellite cells in the quadriceps muscle at time of surgery.

Methods: Biopsies were obtained from 29 patients undergoing TKR. Power output was assessed pre-operatively and at six and 26 weeks post-operatively with a Leg Extensor Power Rig and data were scaled for body weight. Satellite cell content was assessed in two separate analyses, the first cohort (n = 18) using immunohistochemistry and the second (n = 11) by a new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) protocol for Pax-7 (generic satellite cell marker) and Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM; marker of activated cells).

Results: A significant improvement in power output was observed post-operatively with a mean improvement of 19.7 W (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.43 to 30.07; p < 0.001) in the first cohort and 27.5 W (95% CI 13.2 to 41.9; p = 0.002) in the second. A strong correlation was noted between satellite cell number (immunohistochemistry) and improvement in patient power output (r = 0.64, p = 0.008). Strong correlation was also observed between the expression of Pax-7 and power output (r = 0.79, p = 0.004), and the expression of NCAM and power output (r = 0.84, p = 0.001). The generic marker explained 58% of the variation in power output, and the marker of activated cells 67%.

Conclusions: Muscle satellite cell content may determine improvement in lower limb power generation (and thus function) following TKR.

Keywords: Muscle; Outcome; Regenerative potential; Satellite cell; TKR; Total knee replacement; q-PCR.

Grants and funding

At the time of this work DFH received a PhD studentship form the Medical Research Council and Stryker UK. These bodies had no role in the design; collection, analysis or interpretation of data; or in the writing of the article and decision to submit for publication