Comparative proteomic analysis of aluminum tolerance in tibetan wild and cultivated barleys

PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e63428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063428. Print 2013.

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major limiting factor for plant production in acid soils. Wild barley germplasm is rich in genetic diversity and may provide elite genes for crop Al tolerance improvement. The hydroponic-experiments were performed to compare proteomic and transcriptional characteristics of two contrasting Tibetan wild barley genotypes Al- resistant/tolerant XZ16 and Al-sensitive XZ61 as well as Al-resistant cv. Dayton. Results showed that XZ16 had less Al uptake and translocation than XZ61 and Dayton under Al stress. Thirty-five Al-tolerance/resistance-associated proteins were identified and categorized mainly in metabolism, energy, cell growth/division, protein biosynthesis, protein destination/storage, transporter, signal transduction, disease/defense, etc. Among them, 30 were mapped on barley genome, with 16 proteins being exclusively up-regulated by Al stress in XZ16, including 4 proteins (S-adenosylmethionine-synthase 3, ATP synthase beta subunit, triosephosphate isomerase, Bp2A) specifically expressed in XZ16 but not Dayton. The findings highlighted the significance of specific-proteins associated with Al tolerance, and verified Tibetan wild barley as a novel genetic resource for Al tolerance.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum / toxicity*
  • Culture Techniques
  • Genotype
  • Hordeum / drug effects*
  • Hordeum / genetics
  • Hordeum / growth & development
  • Hordeum / metabolism*
  • Plant Proteins / genetics
  • Plant Proteins / metabolism
  • Plant Roots / drug effects
  • Plant Roots / genetics
  • Proteomics*
  • Stress, Physiological / drug effects
  • Stress, Physiological / genetics
  • Tibet
  • Transcriptome / drug effects
  • Up-Regulation / drug effects

Substances

  • Plant Proteins
  • Aluminum

Grants and funding

This study was financially supported by the National 863 program (2012AA101105) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30630047). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.