Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for secondary repair of retinal detachment

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2013 Jul-Aug;44(4):374-9. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20130604-02. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Abstract

Background and objective: To investigate the optimal technique for repairing recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.

Patients and methods: A 2-year retrospective review of recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments by 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or combined 23-gauge PPV with encircling scleral buckling was performed. The primary outcome was anatomical success. The secondary outcome was the likelihood of achieving a final best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better at 6-month follow-up.

Results: Anatomical success was achieved in 65.2% (95% CI, 53.4% to 75.4%) of the PPV group versus 74.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 85.8%) of the PPV-scleral buckling group with one additional procedure (not statistically significant). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving a final acuity of at least 6/12 between groups at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion: The results of our study do not demonstrate a superiority of method of primary repair, or of one method of secondary repair, over another.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Recurrence
  • Retinal Detachment / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Scleral Buckling / methods*
  • Visual Acuity
  • Vitrectomy / methods*