Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

Abstract

Extramedullary (EM) tibial alignment guides have demonstrated a limited degree of accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the tibial component alignment obtained using a portable, accelerometer-based navigation device versus EM alignment guides. One hundred patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study to receive a TKA using either the navigation device, or an EM guide. Standing AP hip-to-ankle and lateral knee-to-ankle radiographs were obtained at the first, postoperative visit. 95.7% of tibial components in the navigation cohort were within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis, versus 68.1% in the EM cohort (P<0.001). 95.0% of tibial components in the navigation cohort were within 2° of a 3° posterior slope, versus 72.1% in the EM cohort (P=0.007). A portable, accelerometer-based navigation device decreases outliers in tibial component alignment compared to conventional, EM alignment guides in TKA.

Keywords: component alignment; computer navigation; posterior slope; tibial alignment; total knee arthroplasty.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / instrumentation*
  • Awards and Prizes
  • Bone Malalignment / prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Orthopedics
  • Societies, Medical
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted
  • Tibia / surgery*
  • United States