Evaluation factors of pulmonary embolism severity and prognosis

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015 Apr;21(3):273-84. doi: 10.1177/1076029613501540. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Abstract

Management of pulmonary embolism (PE) is still unclear. We summarized 16 kinds of evaluation factors of PE severity and prognosis, and we analyzed the single and joint value for short-term and long-term prognosis. Among them, biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, troponin, and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein are the best indicators of PE severity and short-term prognosis. They might replace imaging detections in evaluating PE severity. But the positive predictive value of all the biomarkers is low, and we need to improve each value through joint detection. The PE severity index and simplified PE severity index are more suitable for evaluating the overall risk and long-term prognosis. They could be used as complements of indicators of the PE severity, especially in identifying low-risk group. Integrated risk stratification and strategies of management should be established based on the 2 aspects mentioned previously.

Keywords: evaluation factors; prognosis; pulmonary embolism; severity.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3
  • Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins / blood*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain / blood*
  • Peptide Fragments / blood*
  • Prognosis
  • Pulmonary Embolism / blood*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Troponin / blood*

Substances

  • FABP3 protein, human
  • Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3
  • Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Troponin
  • pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain