Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life

Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Dec;56(12):1415-22. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a62dbb.

Abstract

Background: Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy is advocated for combined rectal and vaginal prolapse, but limited outcome data have been reported.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and outcomes of sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy by comparing pre- and postoperative function and quality of life.

Design: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of all patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy at our institution from 2004 to 2011.

Interventions and outcome measures: Preoperatively, all patients underwent physiology testing and completed 4 validated questionnaires assessing bowel symptom severity and associated quality of life. Patients completed the same questionnaires in 2012.

Results: A total of 110 women (median age, 55 years; range, 28-88) underwent a sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy, 33 with concomitant hysterectomy. All patients had rectal prolapse (n = 96) or rectal intussusception (n = 14), and each also had either enterocele (n = 86) or vaginal prolapse (n = 48). Rectal prolapse with enterocele was the most common presentation (n = 75). Previous surgery included rectal prolapse repair (21%) and hysterectomy (57%). Complications included presacral bleeding (n = 2), ureteral injury (n = 2), wound infection (n = 8), and pulmonary embolism (n = 2). There were no mortalities. Fifty-two patients completed the follow-up questionnaires, with a median follow-up of 29 (range, 4-90) months, and preoperative surveys were available in 30 of these patients. Preoperatively, 93% reported constipation; 82% reported resolution or improvement postoperatively. Constipation severity, measured with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire, demonstrated improvement (1.86-1.17; p < 0.001). Fecal incontinence severity scores (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) improved (39-24; p < 0.01), and 82% of incontinent patients reported cure or improvement. Quality-of-life scores also improved significantly. No patient developed recurrent rectal prolapse.

Limitations: This was a retrospective review, and the response rate to questionnaires was limited.

Conclusions: Sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy for combined middle and posterior compartment prolapse is a safe procedure, with low risk for recurrence, and improves bowel function and quality of life in most patients.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adnexa Uteri / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Constipation / etiology
  • Constipation / surgery*
  • Fecal Incontinence / etiology
  • Fecal Incontinence / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Rectal Prolapse / complications
  • Rectal Prolapse / surgery*
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Prolapse / complications
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*