The fosfomycin resistance gene fosB3 is located on a transferable, extrachromosomal circular intermediate in clinical Enterococcus faecium isolates

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e78106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078106. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Some VanM-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from China are also resistant to fosfomycin. To investigate the mechanism of fosfomycin resistance in these clinical isolates, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, filter-mating, Illumina/Solexa sequencing, inverse PCR and fosfomycin resistance gene cloning were performed. Three E. faecium clinical isolates were highly resistant to fosfomycin and vancomycin with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >1024 µg/ml and >256 µg/ml, respectively. The fosfomycin and vancomycin resistance of these strains could be co-transferred by conjugation. They carried a fosfomycin resistance gene fosB encoding a protein differing by one or two amino acids from FosB, which is encoded on staphylococcal plasmids. Accordingly, the gene was designated fosB3. The fosB3 gene was cloned into pMD19-T, and transformed into E. coli DH5α. The fosfomycin MIC for transformants with fosB3 was 750-fold higher than transformants without fosB3. The fosB3 gene could be transferred by an extrachromosomal circular intermediate. The results indicate that the fosB3 gene is transferable, can mediate high level fosfomycin resistance in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and can be located on a circular intermediate.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology*
  • Conjugation, Genetic / genetics
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial / genetics*
  • Enterococcus faecium / drug effects
  • Enterococcus faecium / genetics*
  • Fosfomycin / pharmacology*
  • Genes, Bacterial / genetics
  • Genes, Bacterial / physiology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Vancomycin / pharmacology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Fosfomycin
  • Vancomycin

Grants and funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81171613 and 81120108024) and the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (No. 10411961500). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.