Earigate™ for softening ear wax: is it safe when the eardrum is perforated?

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the safety of Earigate™ as an ear wax softening product.

Study design: Prospective, controlled animal study.

Methods: Bilateral wide myringotomies were performed in eleven chinchillas. In each animal, Earigate™ was delivered to a randomly selected experimental ear canal as 2 puffs twice a day. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) was used to assess the hearing of the animals before, 3 days and 10 days following the local application of Earigate™. The ABR threshold shifts were compared for both experimental and control ears.

Results: The mean hearing threshold shifts in the experimental animals were comparable at all frequencies and at days 3 and 10. No statistically significant differences were observed in the mean threshold shifts for all of the frequencies evaluated, between the control and experimental ears.

Conclusions: The administration of Earigate™ to the middle ear of chinchillas did not cause any ototoxicity as assessed by ABR.

Keywords: ABR; Cerumen; Chinchilla; Earigate; Ototoxicity; Sea water.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cerumen / drug effects*
  • Cerumenolytic Agents / toxicity*
  • Chinchilla
  • Disease Models, Animal*
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / physiology
  • Female
  • Hearing / drug effects*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tympanic Membrane Perforation / complications*

Substances

  • Cerumenolytic Agents