Two faces of shame: the roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism

Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):799-805. doi: 10.1177/0956797613508790. Epub 2014 Jan 6.

Abstract

Psychological research using mostly cross-sectional methods calls into question the presumed function of shame as an inhibitor of immoral or illegal behavior. In a longitudinal study of 476 jail inmates, we assessed shame proneness, guilt proneness, and externalization of blame shortly after incarceration. We interviewed participants (N = 332) 1 year after release into the community, and we accessed official arrest records (N = 446). Guilt proneness negatively and directly predicted reoffense in the 1st year after release; shame proneness did not. Further mediational modeling showed that shame proneness positively predicted recidivism via its robust link to externalization of blame. There remained a direct effect of shame on recidivism: Unimpeded by defensive externalization of blame, shame inhibited recidivism. Items assessing a motivation to hide were primarily responsible for this pattern. Overall, our results suggest that the pain of shame may have two faces-one with destructive potential and the other with constructive potential.

Keywords: antisocial behavior; emotions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / psychology
  • Crime / psychology*
  • Crime / statistics & numerical data
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Guilt
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Personality Inventory
  • Prisoners / psychology*
  • Prisoners / statistics & numerical data
  • Psychometrics
  • Self Concept*
  • Shame*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult