Don't panic: interpretation bias is predictive of new onsets of panic disorder

J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Jan;28(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Abstract

Psychological models of panic disorder postulate that interpretation of ambiguous material as threatening is an important maintaining factor for the disorder. However, demonstrations of whether such a bias predicts onset of panic disorder are missing. In the present study, we used data from the Dresden Prediction Study, in which a epidemiologic sample of young German women was tested at two time points approximately 17 months apart, allowing the study of biased interpretation as a potential risk factor. At time point one, participants completed an Interpretation Questionnaire including two types of ambiguous scenarios: panic-related and general threat-related. Analyses revealed that a panic-related interpretation bias predicted onset of panic disorder, even after controlling for two established risk factors: anxiety sensitivity and fear of bodily sensations. This is the first prospective study demonstrating the incremental validity of interpretation bias as a predictor of panic disorder onset.

Keywords: Anxiety sensitivity; Fear of bodily sensations; Interpretation bias; Panic disorder; Prospective; Risk factor.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anxiety
  • Bias*
  • Fear
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological
  • Models, Psychological
  • Panic Disorder / diagnosis*
  • Panic Disorder / psychology*
  • Panic*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult