Dissociating distractor-filtering at encoding and during maintenance

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):960-7. doi: 10.1037/a0036013. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

Abstract

The effectiveness of distractor-filtering is a potentially important determinant of working memory capacity (WMC). However, a distinction between the contributions of distractor-filtering at WM encoding as opposed to filtering during maintenance has not been made and the assumption is that these rely on the same mechanism. Within 2 experiments, 1 conducted in the laboratory with 21 participants, and the other played as a game on smartphones (n = 3,247) we measure WMC without distractors, and present distractors during encoding or during the delay period of a WM task to determine performance associated with distraction at encoding and during maintenance. Despite differences in experimental setting and paradigm design between the 2 studies, we show a unique contribution to WMC from both encoding and delay distractor performance in both experiments, while controlling for performance in the absence of distraction. Thus, within 2 separate experiments, 1 involving an extremely large cohort of 3,247 participants, we show a dissociation between encoding and delay distractor-filtering, indicating that separate mechanisms may contribute to WMC.

Publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ascorbic Acid / pharmacology
  • Attention* / drug effects
  • Benserazide / pharmacology
  • Cell Phone
  • Control Groups
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Levodopa / pharmacology
  • Male
  • Memory, Short-Term* / drug effects
  • Orientation / drug effects
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual* / drug effects
  • Perceptual Masking
  • Placebo Effect
  • Reaction Time / drug effects
  • Sensory Gating* / drug effects
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Levodopa
  • Benserazide
  • Ascorbic Acid