How developmental psychopathology theory and research can inform the research domain criteria (RDoC) project

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(2):280-90. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.873981. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

Abstract

The recently proposed Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project has the potential to stimulate new research and overcome many of the limitations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders taxonomy. In the present article we focus, in three main sections, on how theory and research from developmental psychopathology can inform RDoC. First, we discuss the ontology of mental illness and the potential advantages of the RDoC approach to understanding the nature of mental illness. Second, we note potential issues to consider when implementing the RDoC framework, including (a) integrating developmental processes, (b) classifying mental illness within a dimensional approach, and (c) avoiding problems associated with biological reductionism. Third, we describe how a developmental psychopathology perspective may inform each of these potential issues within RDoC. Finally, we highlight the study of emotion and the centrality of affective processes within the RDoC framework. Specifically, we describe how constructionist models of emotion are consistent with developmental psychopathology and how this perspective on emotion can help to guide RDoC research.

MeSH terms

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders / classification*
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Psychiatry / methods*
  • Psychiatry / standards*
  • Psychopathology*
  • Research Design
  • Research*