Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique

Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):225-30. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000064.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of implant impressions in parallel and nonparallel implants of All-on-Four treatment plan.

Materials and methods: A reference model containing 4 internal-connection implant analogs was fabricated according to All-on-Four treatment plan (2 anterior implants at 0 degree and 2 posterior implants at 30 degrees in relation to the perpendicular line). Twenty impressions of this model were made using open-tray impression technique. Impressions were poured with American Dental Association type 4 stone, and the positional accuracy of the implant replica heads in x-, y-, and z- axes was evaluated using a coordinate measuring machine. These measurements were compared with the obtained measurements from the reference model that served as control, and data were analyzed using independent test (α = 0.05).

Results: The results showed that the accuracy of the implant impressions did not show any significant difference between the tilted and straight implants except in y-coordinate (P = 0.012).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the accuracy of the implant impressions did not differ for different implant angulations in All-on-Four treatment plan.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Dental Impression Materials
  • Dental Impression Technique* / standards
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / methods*
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / standards
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques

Substances

  • Dental Impression Materials