Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bright blood high spatial resolution (HR) coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with low spatial resolution (LR) bright blood coronary MRA at 7 T.
Materials and methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent navigator-gated 3-dimensional imaging of the right coronary artery at 7 T using 2 sequences: HR bright blood and LR bright blood. Image postprocessing involved newly developed multiplanar reformatting to straighten the right coronary artery. Image quality was determined by vessel edge sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, visible vessel length, and vessel diameter.
Results: Vessel edge sharpness was statistically significantly higher in HR as compared with LR (0.57 ± 0.1 vs 0.46 ± 0.06; P < 0.001), at the cost of lower signal-to-noise ratio (HR, 32.9 ± 11.0 vs LR, 112.5 ± 48.9; P < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (HR, 17.9 ± 7.4 vs LR, 50.5 ± 26.1; P < 0.001). Visible vessel length and vessel diameter were similar for both sequences (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: High spatial resolution bright blood coronary MRA at 7 T is feasible and improves vessel edge sharpness as compared with LR bright blood imaging.