Ethanol lock therapy (E-Lock) in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) after major heart surgery (MHS): a randomized clinical trial

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e91838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091838. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Lock-therapy with antimicrobials has been used for the treatment and prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI). Experiences with Ethanol-Locks (E-locks) have included therapeutic interventions with variable results. Patients undergoing Major Heart Surgery (MHS) are a high-risk population for CR-BSI.The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance to E-Locks in the prevention of CR-BSI of patients undergoing MHS.

Methods and findings: This is an academic, prospective, randomized, non-blinded and controlled clinical trial assessing the incidence of CR-BSI of patients with E-locks (E-lock) and the tolerance to the procedure in comparison with patients receiving conventional catheter-care (CCC). Patients undergoing MHS with intravascular catheters for more than 48 hours were randomly assigned into treatment or control group by a computer-generated list of randomly assigned numbers. In the treatment group, all their catheter lumens were locked with an ethanol solution at 70% for two hours, every three days (E-Locks). The control group received conventional catheter-care (CCC). Overall, 200 patients with 323 catheters were included in the study, which was stopped after 10 months due to adverse events. Of them, 179 catheters (113 patients) had E-Locks and 144 catheters (87 patients) were CCC. Euroscore Surgical Risk in both groups was 4.04 vs 4.07 p = 0.94 respectively. The results for the E-Locks and CCC were as follows: Incidence of CR-BSI/1000 days of exposure 2.1 vs 5.2 (p = 0.33), catheter tip colonization 14 (7.8%) vs 6 (4.2%) patients (p = 0.17), median length of hospital stay, 15 vs 16 days (p = 0.77). Seven patients (6.19%), all in the ethanol branch, had to discontinue the trial due to intolerance or adverse events.

Conclusions: We do not recommend prophylaxis of CR-BSI with ethanol-lock on a routine basis in patients undergoing Major Heart Surgery.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01229592.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Catheter-Related Infections / etiology*
  • Catheter-Related Infections / microbiology
  • Catheter-Related Infections / prevention & control*
  • Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects
  • Catheters, Indwelling / adverse effects*
  • Ethanol / administration & dosage*
  • Ethanol / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Ethanol

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01229592

Grants and funding

This study was partially supported by a grant from Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, FIS EC07/90653 (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) and by the Rafael del Pino Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.