Agreement between ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessing percentage body fat in college-aged adults

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Nov;34(6):493-6. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12150. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

Background: The BodyMetrix(®) BX-2000 Ultrasound device (ULTRA) shows prowess in being an effective alternative to the expense and technicality of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, this technique has not been investigated using a seven-site methodology.

Subject/objective: To employ a cross-over design to investigate the agreement between ULTRA using a seven-site methodology and DXA in assessing body fat (%BF) in a normal-weight sample of college-age men and women.

Methods: Subjects (n = 84, BMI = 23.6 ± 3.6 kg m(-²), age = 23.0 ± 4.7 years) participated in this study with %BF measurements following the manufacturer's specifications.

Results: Significant differences were observed between methods with ULTRA less than DXA (difference = 4.4 ± 0.8%, t-statistic = 7.27, P<0.001) with no difference between men and women.

Conclusion: The current study showed that ULTRA using a seven-site methodology did not agree with DXA in measuring %BF. Thus, this investigational ULTRA methodology might not be appropriate in estimating %BF in this population.

Keywords: DXA; body composition analysis; percentage body fat; ultrasound device.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon* / instrumentation
  • Adipose Tissue / diagnostic imaging*
  • Adiposity*
  • Adult
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Transducers
  • Ultrasonography / instrumentation
  • Young Adult