Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional ultrasonography

Abdom Imaging. 2014 Oct;39(5):988-99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0135-8.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional ultrasonography (CE 3D US) for differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.

Methods: Eighty-five patients with solid pancreatic lesions who underwent CE 3D US were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-four patients had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 10 had mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP), and 11 had neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Two blinded readers evaluated the enhancement patterns using four features: vascularity in the arterial phase, vascularity in the venous phase, vessel location, and vessel form. Vascularity in both phases was classified as hypervascular, isovascular, or hypovascular. Vessel location was classified into peritumoral or intratumoral. Vessel form was classified into fine or irregular. Kappa values were used to assess inter-reader agreement. The institutional review board approved this study, and informed consent was obtained.

Results: Kappa values of the four features were 0.75, 0.72, 0.85, and 0.65, which were graded as good or excellent. The most typical combined enhancement pattern in PDAC was hypovascularity in both phases with peritumoral and irregular vessels; MFP was isovascular in both phases with intratumoral and fine vessels; and NETs were hypervascular in both phases with intratumoral and irregular vessels. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the three patterns were 93.8% and 96.7% for the PDAC pattern, 80.0% and 100% for the MFP pattern, and 81.8%, and 69.2% for the NET pattern, respectively. The accuracy of these diagnostic criteria was 90.5%.

Conclusion: CE 3D US allows detailed visualization of the enhancement patterns of various pancreatic lesions and can be used for the differential diagnosis.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Contrast Media*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors / diagnostic imaging*
  • Observer Variation
  • Pancreas / diagnostic imaging
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography

Substances

  • Contrast Media