Introduction: Although most guidelines for quality assessment of INR PMs recommend specific procedures, no clear regulation or methodology is required for outpatients in our country. We have developed a specific INR portable monitor (PM) quality control system within our telemedicine organization to check over time quality performances and plan corrective actions.
Methods: Based on current guidelines for laboratory QC, the following aspects were assessed: suitability of PM, defined in terms of imprecision and accuracy; intra-assay imprecision, defined according to monthly revision of Levey-Jennings cards with data from each peripheral healthcare unit (PHU), using an internal QC provided by the manufacturer (CV ± 20% considered as acceptable); quarterly accuracy study, for assessing agreement between analytical instruments, based on duplicate analysis of three samples with INR values reflecting different therapeutic ranges (differences ± 0.5 considered as acceptable); external quality assessment (NEQAS).
Results: In the nine PHU, 18 portable monitors were used to perform 22 929 test during year 2010. Analytical imprecision was low, showing CVs always <5%. Accuracy check showed two of 216 results out of range (0.92%), thus providing timely indication for instrument replacement. The external QC NEQAS showed optimal performance.
Conclusion: The current protocol for INR PMs quality assessment was effective to establish and maintain a reliable control of devices, ensuring the quality of analytical data over time. National authorities should be prompted to guarantee and apply correct protocols for INR-PM use.
Keywords: PT-INR; Portable monitors; quality control; telemedicine.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.