Clinical communication skills learning outcomes among first year medical students are consistent irrespective of participation in an interview for admission to medical school

Med Teach. 2014 Jul;36(7):640-2. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907880. Epub 2014 May 6.

Abstract

Background: Although contentious most medical schools interview potential students to assess personal abilities such as communication.

Aims: To investigate any differences in clinical communication skills (CCS) between first year students admitted to UQ medical school with or without an admissions interview.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1495 student assessment scores obtained after structured communication skills training (CCS) between 2007 and 2010.

Results: The average assessment score was 3.76 ([95% CI, 3.73-3.78]) and adjusting for student characteristics, showed no main effect for interview (p = 0.89). The strongest predictor of scores was gender with females achieving significantly higher scores (3.91 [95% CI, 3.54-4.28] vs. 3.76 [95% CI, 3.39-4.13]; p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions: Data show no differences in post-training assessment measures between students who were interviewed during selection or not. Further research about the quality and retention of communications skills after training is warranted.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence / standards*
  • Communication*
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / methods
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
  • Educational Measurement / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Queensland
  • Retrospective Studies
  • School Admission Criteria / statistics & numerical data*
  • Schools, Medical
  • Sex Factors
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Students, Medical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Young Adult