Targeting LDL: is lower better and is it safe?

Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jun;28(3):309-24. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the most validated targets in clinical medicine. Large randomized, outcome trials have demonstrated a clear relationship between reducing LDL-C and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, which has been maintained to LDL-C levels of <1.8 mmol/L. To assess the benefit of even lower LDL-C it is important to recognize that CVD risk reduction is related to absolute reduction in LDL-C, not to percent change. Furthermore measurement of LDL-C is also critical as recent studies show the Friedewald calculation significantly underestimates true LDL-C values <1.8 mmol/L, distorting the relationship with CVD risk reduction. Discussion of potential harm from low, or lower, LDL-C has centered on cancer, hemorrhagic stroke, and violent death, but there is little evidence from outcome trials to show a relationship with low LDL-C. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors which will reduce LDL-C well below 1.3 mmol/L, will likely provide the clearest answer to both the question of efficacy and safety of low LDL-C within the next few years.

Keywords: Friedewald formula; LDL cholesterol; PCSK9 inhibitors; statins.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anticholesteremic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / blood
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / etiology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / prevention & control
  • Cholesterol, LDL / antagonists & inhibitors*
  • Cholesterol, LDL / blood*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Humans
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / adverse effects*
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / methods*
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Cholesterol, LDL