Limits and complications of laparoscopic myomectomy: which are the best predictors? A large cohort single-center experience

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;290(5):951-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3289-2. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a correlation exists between size, location, type of myomas and perioperative outcomes.

Methods: This is a observational study in women undergone to laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) because of single symptomatic myoma >4 cm in diameter. We collected data about general features, surgical outcomes, intraoperative/postoperative complications and time to return to normal activity.

Results: A total of 444 patients (mean age 36.7 ± 6.4 years) resulted eligible for the study. Myomas sized between 8 and 12 cm were linked to an increased amount of blood loss (significantly higher in intramural than subserosal myoma). The removal of intramural myomas >8 cm and the subserosal ones >12 cm required a significant longer surgical time. Patients returned 17.9 ± 9.5 days after surgery to their personal activities. Six cases (1.35 %) required conversion to laparotomy, and only in two cases blood transfusion was necessary.

Conclusion: Myomas size and type represent the best predictors of surgical difficulties and possible intrapostoperative complications. Intramural myomas >8 cm and subserosal ones >12 cm should be considered as a challenging procedure. LM remains the gold standard approach because of very low perioperative complication rate and faster return to normal activity.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Laparotomy
  • Leiomyoma / surgery*
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Regression Analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Myomectomy*
  • Uterine Neoplasms / surgery*