Background: Rectal cancer guidelines recommend transrectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for Stage II/III disease, but studies show these are underutilized. We examined how surgeon preferences align with guidelines or vary by training.
Methods: Questionnaires on training, years of practice, and staging/treatment preferences were sent to surgeons practicing in Florida.
Results: Of 759 surveys distributed, 321 (42%) responded; 158 were excluded because they were trainees, not treating rectal cancer, or not board certified/eligible. Among the remaining 163, 71% were general surgeons, 18% colorectal surgeons, and 11% surgical oncologists. Colorectal surgeons and surgical oncologists were more likely than general surgeons to prefer transrectal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging (79% vs 50%; P < .01), and neoadjuvant CRT (71% vs 45%; P < .01). Differences remained significant after adjusting for years in practice.
Conclusion: Increased focus on appropriate use of staging procedures and neoadjuvant CRT within general surgery training/educational programs is warranted.
Keywords: Guideline adherence; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.