Background: A key anatomical consideration and determinant of surgical approach in trochlear dysplasia is the trochlear boss height (TBH), traditionally defined by measurements on plain X-rays (XR). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly used for pre-operative planning and follow-up. However, it is unclear whether measurement of TBH on XR is applicable to MR. The aim of this study was to establish the reliability of TBH measurement on MR compared to XR.
Methods: This study used lateral knee radiographs and MR scans of 14 knees of patients with trochlear dysplasia, six knees of non-dysplastic patients with anterior knee pain (AKP), and five knees of non-dysplastic controls with no AKP. Correlation between XR and MR measurements was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Agreement between methods and observers was assessed using Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results: Bland-Altman charts showed a total width of 95% limits of agreement of 4.78 mm for XR and MR subchondral bone (SB) TBH measurements, and 6.73 mm for XR and MR cartilage TBH measurements. Inter-observer ICCs were 0.86 for XR, 0.62 for MR SB, and 0.53 for MR cartilage. The widths of the Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between observers were 4.79 mm (XR), 5.04 mm (MR SB) and 4.74 mm (MR cartilage).
Conclusion: Measurement of TBH on MR is not directly interchangeable with XR. Adjustments need to be made to treatment thresholds based on XR measurement if MR is used instead.
Keywords: MRI; Method comparison; Plain radiographs; Trochlear dysplasia.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.