Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up?

Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Oct;40(9):1089-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

Abstract

Breast cancer complexity has long been known and investigated. After a first classification of the disease based on histology features, starting from the 1980s breast cancers have been distinguished on the basis of oestrogen receptor expression and later according to HER2. By 2000 the "microarray revolution" had shown that the phenotypic differences between breast cancers were a reflection of their mRNA expression profiles, while the more recent "genomic revolution" is revealing the genomic bases of breast cancer heterogeneity. However, how this huge amount of data and knowledge translate into clinically relevant practice is currently not clear. In the present review we discuss how the different breast cancer classification methods might translate into improved clinical guidelines with regard to staging, therapy, and follow up of patients with breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Follow-up; Molecular subtypes; Staging; Systemic therapy; mRNA expression.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Breast Neoplasms / metabolism*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Breast Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / methods
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Receptor, ErbB-2 / metabolism

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • ERBB2 protein, human
  • Receptor, ErbB-2