The performance of three-sample qualitative immunochemical fecal test to detect colorectal adenoma and cancer in gastrointestinal outpatients: an observational study

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 8;9(9):e106648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106648. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Repeated qualitative fecal immunochemical test (qlFIT) is a clinical strategy widely used to detect lower gastrointestinal lesions, but its diagnostic power has not been assessed in opportunistic screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the performance of three-sample qlFIT in screening for colorectal cancer and its precursors in high-risk participants.

Methods: 513 gastrointestinal outpatients yielded three qlFITs before a standard colonoscopy. We evaluated the diagnostic value of one, two, and three positive qlFITs serving as the positivity threshold. The risk factors of colorectal neoplasia to yield positive qlFITs were also determined.

Results: 52 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 70 with advanced adenomatous polyp. For colorectal cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of one positive qlFIT were 90.4% and 53.8%, of two were 80.8% and 75.1%, and of three were 53.9% and 88.5%, respectively. For advanced adenomatous polyp, the sensitivity and specificity of one positive qlFIT were 81.4% and 54.2%, of two were 50.0% and 72.5%, and of three were 28.6% and 86.2%. Left-sided location (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.26-4.95) and advanced histology of tumors (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.58-6.01) were independently associated with positive qlFITs.

Conclusions: Three-sample qlFIT is a reasonably good method to detect colorectal neoplasia in high-risk population. Tumors in the left side or with advanced pathological features are more likely to produce positive qlFITs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adenoma / diagnosis*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma / diagnosis*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Feces*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Outpatients*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The special funding of capital health research and development, No. 2011-4001-01, Beijing Municipal Government, China, funded this study. The website was www.bjhbkj.com. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.