Utilisation and outcomes of case-based discussion in otolaryngology training

Objectives: To assess the reliability, validity and outcomes of Case-based Discussion (CBD) in otolaryngology training.

Design: Retrospective database analysis.

Setting: National electronic database.

Participants: North London otolaryngology trainees.

Main outcome measures: We tested the tool's reliability along with its capacity to denote trainee progress. A score was calculated (cS) and compared across core (CT) and specialty trainees (ST) at all levels. The number of items rated as "development required" (D) was also examined.

Results: One thousand four hundred and fifty-six CBDs were submitted by 46 trainees from 2007 to 2013, averaging 13.6 per trainee per year. Items relating to knowledge, management and judgement were more popular (98% usage), and better predictors of cS compared to other parameters (rs: +0.74, +0.70 and +0.72, respectively). CBD was found to be reliable (Cronbach's α = 0.848) and highly sensitive (99%), yet not specific. cS was significantly higher in ST than CT (95.3% ± 0.6 versus 88.7% ± 1.3). pS showed a similar pattern (3.15 ± 0.4 versus 2.0 ± 0.05) (P < 0.001). cS and pS increased from CT1 to ST8 (rs: +0.60 and +0.34, respectively). The number of D-rated items decreased with increasing year of training.

Conclusion: Case-based discussion is a reliable and valid tool in otolaryngology training. It is highly sensitive but not specific. Trainees should be encouraged to use it at all levels.