Objective: To investigate whether motion correction improves glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (gagCEST imaging) of intervertebral discs (IVDs).
Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance gagCEST imaging of 12 volunteers was obtained in lumbar IVDs at 3 T using a prototype pulse sequence. The data were motion-corrected using a prototype diffeomorphism-based motion compensation technique. For both the data with and that without motion correction (datac, datauc), CEST evaluation was performed using the magnetisation transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) as a means of quantifying CEST effects. MTRasym and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the MTRasym map in the nucleus pulposus (NP) were compared for datac and datauc. A visual grading analysis was performed by a radiologist in order to subjectively quantify the quality of the MTRasym analysis (score 1: best quality, score 5: worst quality). Furthermore, a landmark analysis was performed in order to objectively quantify the motion between CEST images using the mean landmark distance dmean.
Results: MTRasym and SNR were significantly higher for the motion-corrected data than for the uncorrected CEST data (MTRasym(datac) = 3.77 % ± 0.95 %, MTRasym(datauc) = 3.41 % ± 1.54 %, p value = 0.001; SNR(datac) = 3.88 ± 2.04, SNR(datauc) = 2.77 ± 1.55, p value < 0.001, number of IVDs = 48). The visual grading analysis revealed a higher reliability for datac (maximum score = 2) compared with datauc (maximum score = 5). The landmark analysis demonstrated the superiority of the motion-corrected data (dmean(datac) = 0.08 mm ± 0.09 mm, dmean(datauc) = 0.36 mm ± 0.09 mm, p value = 0.001).
Conclusion: Our study showed significant improvements in the ability to quantify CEST imaging in IVDs after the application of motion correction compared with uncorrected datasets.