Rational design of gold nanoparticle toxicology assays: a question of exposure scenario, dose and experimental setup

Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014 Sep;9(13):1971-89. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.139.

Abstract

Many studies have evaluated the toxicity of gold nanoparticles, although reliable predictions based on these results are rare. In order to overcome this problem, this article highlights strategies to improve comparability and standardization of nanotoxicological studies. To this end, it is proposed that we should adapt the nanomaterial to the addressed exposure scenario, using ligand-free nanoparticle references in order to differentiate ligand effects from size effects. Furthermore, surface-weighted particle dosing referenced to the biologically relevant parameter (e.g., cell number or organ mass) is proposed as the gold standard. In addition, it is recommended that we should shift the focus of toxicological experiments from 'live-dead' assays to the assessment of cell function, as this strategy allows observation of bioresponses at lower doses that are more relevant for in vivo scenarios.

Keywords: colloids; dosimetry; functional toxicity; implant debris; ligand; nanogold; nanomaterial; particle characterization; surfactant.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biological Assay*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Gold / therapeutic use
  • Gold / toxicity*
  • Humans
  • Ligands
  • Metal Nanoparticles / therapeutic use
  • Metal Nanoparticles / toxicity*
  • Particle Size
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Ligands
  • Gold