Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 30;9(10):e107942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107942. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate substrate is an important initial step for many studies of electrochemically active materials. In order to help researchers with the substrate selection process, we employ a consistent experimental methodology to evaluate the electrochemical reactivity and stability of seven potential substrate materials for electrocatalyst and photoelectrode evaluation. Using cyclic voltammetry with a progressively increased scan range, we characterize three transparent conducting oxides (indium tin oxide, fluorine-doped tin oxide, and aluminum-doped zinc oxide) and four opaque conductors (gold, stainless steel 304, glassy carbon, and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) in three different electrolytes (sulfuric acid, sodium acetate, and sodium hydroxide). We determine the inert potential window for each substrate/electrolyte combination and make recommendations about which materials may be most suitable for application under different experimental conditions. Furthermore, the testing methodology provides a framework for other researchers to evaluate and report the baseline activity of other substrates of interest to the broader community.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Catalysis
  • Electrochemical Techniques*
  • Electrodes
  • Electrolytes / chemistry*
  • Models, Chemical*
  • Photochemical Processes*

Substances

  • Electrolytes

Grants and funding

JDB and YG were supported as part of the Center of Nanostructuring for Efficient Energy Conversion, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under Award No. DE-SC0001060. Funding source websites: (http://cneec.stanford.edu/) and (http://science.energy.gov/bes/). BAP was supported by CCI Solar Fuels, a National Science Foundation Center for Chemical Innovation under Grant No. CHE-1305124. Funding source websites: (http://www.ccisolar.caltech.edu/) and (http://www.nsf.gov/). JDB received support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program and a Stanford Graduate Fellowship. Funding source websites: (http://www.nsfgrfp.org/) and (http://sgf.stanford.edu/). BAP received funding from a United Technologies Research Center fellowship in Sustainable Energy and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada graduate award. Funding source websites: (http://www.utrc.utc.com/about-fellows.html) and (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.