Presepsin in the prognosis of infectious diseases and diagnosis of infectious disseminated intravascular coagulation: a prospective, multicentre, observational study

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Mar;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000178.

Abstract

Background: Few prospective studies have described the prognostic accuracy of presepsin for 28-day mortality during days 0 to 7, or its role in the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients with infection.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of presepsin levels by comparing infection markers such as procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, as well as markers of DIC such as fibrin degradation products (FDPs) and D-dimer, from days 0 to 7.

Design: A prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Setting: Four medical institutions between June 2010 and June 2011.

Patients: A total of 191 patients who fulfilled at least one of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were enrolled in the study.

Main outcome measures: The presepsin levels were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between SIRS and sepsis, the prognostic accuracy for 28-day mortality from days 0 to 7 and the diagnostic accuracy for DIC in patients with infection by comparison with other infection markers.

Results: The diagnostic accuracy for discriminating between SIRS and sepsis from combining the presepsin and procalcitonin measurements [area under the curve (AUC), 0.91; likelihood ratio, 4.96] was higher than that of presepsin (AUC, 0.89; likelihood ratio, 4.75) or procalcitonin (AUC, 0.85; likelihood ratio, 3.18) alone. Not only the correlation coefficient between the presepsin level and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score but also the prognostic accuracy of presepsin for 28-day mortality increased with the elapsed time, and both were highest at day 7. The diagnostic accuracy for DIC generated by combining presepsin and FDP (AUC, 0.84; likelihood ratio, 3.57) was higher than that of FDP (AUC, 0.82; likelihood ratio, 2.64) or presepsin (AUC, 0.80; likelihood ratio, 2.94) alone.

Conclusion: The prognosis and severity of infection may be assessed more accurately by measuring the presepsin levels until day 7. Presepsin is a useful diagnostic tool for DIC with infection.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Area Under Curve
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Communicable Diseases / blood*
  • Communicable Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Communicable Diseases / mortality
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation / blood*
  • Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation / diagnosis*
  • Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation / mortality
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Inflammation Mediators / blood
  • Japan
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Lipopolysaccharide Receptors / blood*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptide Fragments / blood*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • ROC Curve
  • Sepsis / blood
  • Sepsis / diagnosis
  • Sepsis / mortality
  • Shock, Septic / blood
  • Shock, Septic / diagnosis
  • Shock, Septic / mortality
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / blood
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / diagnosis
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / mortality
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Inflammation Mediators
  • Lipopolysaccharide Receptors
  • Peptide Fragments
  • presepsin protein, human